- 19 Nov, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 3 Mins Read
Performance Tuning in PostgreSQL vs Oracle
Performance Tuning in PostgreSQL vs Oracle — A Complete Comparison
Performance tuning is a critical responsibility for DBAs to ensure that database systems deliver optimum throughput, low latency, and efficient resource utilization. While PostgreSQL and Oracle are both powerful relational database systems, their tuning approaches differ significantly due to variations in architecture, configuration options, memory management, indexing, and toolsets.
1. Core Architecture Differences
| Aspect | PostgreSQL | Oracle |
|---|---|---|
| Process Model | Multi-process | Multi-threaded |
| Buffer Management | Shared buffers + OS cache | SGA + PGA managed by Oracle |
| Storage | MVCC using heap pages | Segments, extents, blocks with advanced storage options |
| Concurrency | MVCC with row-level versioning | MVCC + undo segments |
👉 Because of these architectural differences, PostgreSQL relies heavily on OS-level memory tuning, whereas Oracle requires DBAs to understand SGA/PGA internals for optimal performance.
2. Memory Tuning
PostgreSQL
-
Primary parameter tuning:
-
shared_buffers -
work_mem -
effective_cache_size -
maintenance_work_mem
-
-
OS memory also plays a critical role due to filesystem caching.
Oracle
-
Memory governed via Automatic Memory Management (AMM/ASMM):
-
SGA_TARGET,SGA_MAX_SIZE -
PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET -
Buffer cache, shared pool, redo buffer, etc.
-
👉 Oracle provides more granular memory components, while PostgreSQL tuning is more parameter-based and OS-driven.
3. Query Optimization & Execution Plans
PostgreSQL
-
Uses cost-based optimizer only
-
EXPLAIN & EXPLAIN ANALYZE used for plan analysis
-
Planner influenced by:
-
Statistics in
pg_statistic -
random_page_cost,cpu_tuple_cost
-
Oracle
-
Advanced Cost-Based Optimizer (CBO)
-
Features include:
-
Adaptive query optimization
-
Cardinality feedback
-
SQL Profiles / SQL Plans / Baselines
-
-
Tools:
-
EXPLAIN PLAN -
AWR, ASH, SQL Monitor
-
👉 Oracle provides automatic re-optimization and plan stability features, whereas PostgreSQL relies more on manual performance tuning.
4. Indexing Strategies
| Feature | PostgreSQL | Oracle |
|---|---|---|
| B-Tree Index | Yes | Yes |
| Bitmap Index | No (only via extensions) | Yes |
| Partitioned Index | Limited | Very advanced |
| Function-based Index | Yes | Yes |
| Global Indexes | No (v16 has limited support) | Yes |
👉 Oracle indexing is richer for large-scale transactional systems.
5. Concurrency & Locking
PostgreSQL
-
MVCC with row versioning in heap
-
Vacuum required to clean dead tuples
-
Locks visible in
pg_locks
Oracle
-
Undo-based MVCC
-
Automatic space management
-
Deadlock detection & fine-grained locks
-
No vacuuming required
👉 PostgreSQL performance suffers when autovacuum is misconfigured, while Oracle handles cleanup more efficiently.
6. Performance Monitoring Tools
| Task | PostgreSQL Tools | Oracle Tools |
|---|---|---|
| Query monitoring | pg_stat_activity, pg_stat_statements |
AWR, ASH, OEM, SQL Monitor |
| Wait events | pg_wait_sampling (extension) |
Dynamic views + advanced wait interface |
| Stats analysis | pgBadger, Syslog |
ADDM, AWR, OEM |
| Profiling | Auto-explain module | SQL Tuning Advisor |
👉 Oracle has enterprise-level built-in monitoring, while PostgreSQL relies more on extensions and third-party tools.
7. Tuning Workload Types
| Workload Type | PostgreSQL Strategy | Oracle Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| OLTP | Increase shared buffers, tune checkpoints, optimize indexes | Buffer cache tuning, redo optimization, ASM |
| OLAP | work_mem, partitioning, parallel query |
Partitioning, In-Memory Column Store |
| High Writes | WAL tuning, autovacuum optimization | Redo tuning, LGWR, archive log optimization |
Key Takeaways
| Category | Better Choice |
|---|---|
| Complex Enterprise Workloads | Oracle |
| Cost-Effective Open-source Setup | PostgreSQL |
| Automatic Tuning Capabilities | Oracle |
| Manual Parameter-based Tuning | PostgreSQL |
Final Verdict
-
Choose Oracle if you need enterprise-grade performance tuning, high availability, large-scale workload optimization, and automated tuning tools.
-
Choose PostgreSQL if you prefer open-source, lower cost, simpler architecture, and community-driven tuning.
Want to see how we teach?
Head over to our YouTube channel for insights, tutorials, and tech breakdowns:
 www.youtube.com/@learnomate
To know more about our courses, offerings, and team:
Visit our official website:Â www.learnomate.org
Interested in mastering Oracle Database Administration?
Check out our comprehensive Oracle DBA Training program here: https://learnomate.org/oracle-dba-training/
Want to explore more tech topics?
Check out our detailed blog posts here:Â https://learnomate.org/blogs/
And hey, I’d love to stay connected with you personally!
Let’s connect on LinkedIn: Ankush Thavali
Happy Vibes!
ANKUSH
